![]() ![]() I'm going to flag this for the product team too. Overall, it would be best to discard this projection as best you can. This could indeed be skewing the data for any reports you're generating. We'll also apply the Entire Home pricing to that listing, when in reality they may only be earning from the Private Room. However, as the Entire Home is now not available due to the Private Room booking, the calendar would be blocked off in the same way. If someone booked a single room, we'd pick up on that correctly for that listing. ![]() However, we do run into issues when the same property is listed in multiple configurations. ”Our system will scrape the calendar and pricing information for each of the listings for the property each day. As a result it says the homeowners make around $250,000 a year, when in reality 90% of their bookings or single bedrooms. ![]() When any of the single bedrooms are booked out, air DNA believes that they received $1000 in revenue for that rental. More specifically, there’s a property near my house that rents for $1000 a night for the whole house, or $150 a night per bedroom. When a property address is used as two different listings on the same property, for example if you have a large lake home, and you rented out single bedrooms at a time, or you give the option of renting the entire house, air DNA will assume when the calendar is booked for that property, it’s booked for the highest possible price. It’s very accurate it’s very accurate, except in one very specific and frustrating aspect. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |